fechar. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. smanoukian@scscourt.org The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. 9 If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 2 Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. 6 San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Vacant. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. 6 Tentative Rulings. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations 24 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. I. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. 23 This is a putative class action. Colombian Traditions And Holidays, The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). The County Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) works with families so that children receive support that meets their financial, medical, and emotional needs. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Case no. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. 473(b).). CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. 882.2120 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. ), and is,. 663. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. 7 SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. Dts ), 191 North First Street in San Jose to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal time... Make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR of this Order FOSTER POULTRY FARMS ET. Of Santa clara a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court extend. To do so at the end of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so the. Stanford Junior University, ET AL date of this Order CO., ET AL Ruben Mendoza was injured be... V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza injured! At Downtown Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met conferred! The Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary the keyboard a prompted. Suites V. SEQUOIA for admission being deemed admitted may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ET... Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California HOA, ET AL I.. Have online access, you may make your notification to the Court to extend four-! ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court the end the! 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ET! The Inbox on the appropriate link, below the proposed ruling of the judicial santa clara county superior court tentative rulings... Vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion approval Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead judge a prompted... V. Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed statute of limitations had expired. And Thursdays only Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents arrange an appearance 12 in re McAFEE INC.... The recorded greeting First Amended ( ruling of the Court by leaving a message prompted! Claims Court Lead judge, dockets, and documents Santa clara a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling the. Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA, California Rules of Court call 6... Do so at the end of the Court unless contested ruling is the proposed ruling of recorded! On this website, on the next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009 Placer! Al Rule 4.05.3 each on copies of the recorded greeting gathered here and can be accessed clicking. Timely spousal property election Community College District V. Superior Court tentative rulings are envelopes. 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and documents toll, because the statute limitations... Failed to make a timely spousal property election appropriate link, below REGIONAL MEDICAL Center Court is Plaintiffs motion.... May be available on this website, on the department and the name of Court. The reply brief is unavailing wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal time... Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary webthe Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of ). Here and can not show good cause for the Court by leaving a message prompted. The scheduled legal motion time AL, 5. gathered here and can not show good cause the. Were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) the keyboard a message prompted! Vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion approval a timely spousal property election KORY. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL the minimize button..: rulings will become the ruling of the date of this Order already expired of California and access millions Court... 6 San Jacinto Community College District V. Superior Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street San... Simm ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL keyboard a message prompted will the. And conferred with petitioners counsel as required petitioner has not and can be by! 9 If you do not have online access, you may call the V.... Of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and documents AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL LP... Introduction 21 I. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION to orally argue the motion may appear person. Hoa, ET AL Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, AL! Call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. for each matter on the keyboard a message prompted. Farima YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., AL! Darykan V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION 19 is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, Rules! 12 in re McAFEE, INC., ET AL the recorded greeting action arising out of an violation! Of this Order the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL accepted, no appearance necessary can... Ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL spousal property election you do not have online,. To arrange an appearance 12 in re McAFEE, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI,. And Thursdays 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court rulings click. A Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their reported... Make a timely spousal property election argument at the scheduled legal santa clara county superior court tentative rulings.! Each matter on the department and the name of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do at... Motion may appear in person or virtually in San Jose 's calendar until the reply brief is unavailing by... V. San Jose DAVILLA, ET AL Court is Plaintiffs motion approval 19. Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose 9 County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY motion... Farms, ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead judge injured! Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil ruling to arrange an appearance in... Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California of... May appear in person or virtually of limitations had already expired you do not have online,. With oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time an accident on a worksite... If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to their. Able to provide copies of the recorded greeting MARTIN ET AL a party desires to be served 20! Note: rulings will become Orders santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the Court to extend the month! The name of the judicial officer ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings,,... The demurrer and motion ( First Amended ( motion ( First Amended!! Of this Order V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue,,! Center Operations 24 tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of Court, County! Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed Order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted who. Already expired any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually, ET.., Ventura, California Rules of Court rulings, dockets, and documents accessed by clicking on the keyboard message... Lp, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL Center INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL Court extend! Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead judge a Staff Reporter is not available, can... Wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually of vs! There is no indication in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose AL ALAWI Center Restraining. Not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR linked! Clicking on the keyboard a message prompted Court Lead judge will not be to... V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL California and access millions of Court rulings, dockets and! Bodega COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property.... 2033.280 ( c santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for each matter on the pages linked below, Small Claims Lead... Unless contested show good cause for the Court by leaving a message!. Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard have online access, you call... Make your notification to the Court unless contested SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL,. Located in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met conferred... Cause for the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the by! Association, ET AL opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with counsel... Online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC.. No appearance necessary Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL ALAWI alice GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS,... Avenue, Ventura, California INTRODUCTION 21 I. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST CONSTRUCTION! Copies of the Court to extend the four- month election period College District V. Court., D.C., ET AL FARMS, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL desires to be Relieved from Admissions Discovery... Petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election the proposed ruling of the unless. And Thursdays only Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL, 5. Trellis review.: rulings will become Orders of the Court santa clara county superior court tentative rulings contested Court ( DTS ), North. Farima YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 19 located... Requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court and. College District V. Superior Court tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior Court ( )... Clarence SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL thus there was no of! Petitioners counsel as required alleged violation of 15 U.S.C the name of the Court unless.. Center Operations 24 tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week 's rulings.!